DIRECTIONS FOR THE USE OF COMPETITIVENESS RATINGS OF CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONS
DIRECTIONS FOR THE USE OF COMPETITIVENESS RATINGS OF CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONS
Ключевые слова:
Competitiveness • Rating • Construction • OrganizationАннотация
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to consider the current problem of identifying the competitiveness of construction organizations, where the focus is on rating assessment as a tool for determining the competitiveness of organizations, as well as to develop directions for using ratings at different levels of management (at the level of the state, customer, investors, financial institutions and the construction organization itself). Design/methodology/approach: The authors use the methods of comparative analysis of various rating systems in construction to develop potential directions for the use of ratings in the national construction market. The objects of the study are the countries of the European Union, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Uzbekistan. Findings: It is confirmed that in the context of the rapid transformation of the competitive environment and the digitalization of the construction industry, the assessment of the competitiveness rating of construction firms is becoming an increasingly key tool for comparative analysis and assessment of their work, reducing the risk of non-performance of construction contracts, improving the quality of construction products, and the management of the rating by construction organizations is becoming a necessity for their survival and development in the construction market. Originality/value: A conceptual approach to the functioning of the system of rating assessment of competitiveness of construction organizations for the construction complex of the Republic of Belarus has been developed, as well as practical recommendations on the application of the rating of competitiveness of construction organizations, which are differentiated by the level of management (at the level of the state, customer, contractor and credit institutions, investors). The practical recommendations provide for the use of the rating in assessing the risks of non-performance of contractual obligations, determining the minimum requirements for construction organizations depending on the complexity class of the construction object and the cost of construction of this object, as well as setting conditions on the form and size of tender security, ensuring the performance of contractual and guarantee obligations.
Библиографические ссылки
Go, H. and Lu, W. (2023). Measuring competitiveness using principal component analysis based on data: a thematic study of Chinese international construction companies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(4), 1558-1577. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2020-0262.
Nguyen Ngoc, H., Mohammed Abdelkader, E., Al-Sakkaf, A., Alfala, G., and Zayed, T. (2023). Hybrid AHP-MAUT model for assessing competitiveness of construction companies: a thematic study of construction companies in Vietnam and Canada. Construction Innovation, Vol. In press. DOI: 10.1108/CI-11-2022-0299.
Berg, J.B., Thuesen, K., and Jensen, A. (2023). Procurement innovations as a means of sustainable changes - a thematic study of the Danish model of strategic partnership. Construction Innovation, 23(3), 665-682. DOI: 10.1108/CI-04-2021-0067.
Rose, T., Manley, K., and Waden, K. (2019). Do barriers at the firm level for innovation implementation in construction products vary depending on the position in the supply chain? Construction Innovation, 19(2), 212-235. DOI: 10.1108/CI-11-2017-0090.
Zhang, Y., Oo, B.L., and Lim, B.T.-H. (2023). Factors influencing contractor decisions on bidding or non-bidding and markup: a case of Jilin Province, China. Construction Innovation, 23(5), 1232-1254. DOI: 10.1108/CI-10-2021-0188.
White L., Jones M. (2019). The Role of Innovation in Enhancing Competitiveness of Construction Companies. Journal of Construction Innovation, 30(1), 112-125.
Johnson S., Williams R. (2020). Factors Influencing Competitiveness of Construction Companies: A Case Study Analysis. International Journal of Construction Economics, 15(4), 78-92.
Murillo, K., Rocha, E., and Rodrigues, M.F. (2019). Analysis of the efficiency of the construction sector in seven European countries, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(8), 1801-1819. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-07-2018-0287.
Moazzam Azeem1, Fahim Ullah, Muhammad J. Thaheem, Siddra Qayyum (2020). Competitiveness in the construction industry: A contractor’s perspective on barriers to improving the construction industry performance. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 3(3), 193-219. DOI: 10.31462/jcemi.2020.03193219.
Zhudro, M.K. (2021). Enterprise Economics: textbook manual for specialties 1-27 03 01 «Management of innovative projects of industrial enterprises», 1-27 03 02 «Management of design projects at an industrial enterprise». Bestprint, Minsk.
Mokronosov, A. G. (2014). Competition and competitiveness: textbook manual. Ural Publishing House University, Ekaterinburg.
Simionov, R. Yu. (2007). Rating assessment of construction organizations. Audit and financial analysis, 1, 1–16.
Astrelina, V.V. (2000). Concept of remote rating of financial stability. Banking and financial technologies for the real sector of the economy, 286–293.
Smith J., Brown A. (2018). Competitiveness Rating in the Construction Industry: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Construction Management Journal, 25(2), 45-58.
Ribeiro, L., Gomes, R., & Fernandes, C. (2017). A new competitiveness index for the construction industry: Insights from a European country. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 11(5), 561-571.
Construction Industry Federation. (2020). Measuring the Competitiveness of Irish Construction Firms. URL: https://cif.ie/ (data accessed: 14.02.2024).
Rueckert, S., & Myrzakhmet, B. (2019). Assessing Competitiveness of Construction Companies in Europe: The Case of RCI. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applied Research in Management, Economics and Accounting.
Bundesverband Baustoffe - Steine und Erden. (2018). Competitiveness Index for Construction Companies in Germany. URL: https://www.bbsde.de/ (data accessed: 14.02.2024).
NOSTROY (2021). The rating tool for construction organizations was presented by NOSTROY Vice President Anton Moroz at KazanSummit 2021. URL: https://nostroy.ru/articles/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=21736 (data accessed: 14.02.2024)
RASK (2017). Rating agency of the construction industry: Calculation methodology. URL: https://rask.ru/o-reytinge/metodologii-rascheta.php (data accessed: 14.02.2024).
Information and legal system regulatory legal acts Republic of Kazakhstan (2015). Order of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 11, 2015 No. 648 «On approval of the Rules for public procurement». URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500012590 (data accessed: 14.02.2024).
A rating of construction companies will be compiled in Armenia. URL: https://tunmun.am/en/news/34/ (data accessed: 14.02.2024).
Online rating of construction companies launched in Uzbekistan. URL: https://podrobno.uz/cat/obchestvo/v-uzbekistane-zapushchen-onlayn-reyting-stroitelnykhkompaniy/ (data accessed: 14.02.2024).
Holubava V.S. (2022). Аssessment of life cycle costs of public buildings of socio-cultural purpose. Bulletin of Brest State Technical University, № 3 (129), 74-76.
Shakhovskaya, V.N. (2013). The importance of rating in determining the competitiveness of construction organizations. Economics and management, 2 (34), 47-51.
