Renewable Energy and Agriculture: Developing a Common Language for Technological Integration
Renewable Energy and Agriculture: Developing a Common Language for Technological Integration
Ключевые слова:
Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration, Semantic Mapping, Linguistic Analysis, Interdisciplinary Communication, Semantic Overlaps and DivergencesАннотация
This article explores the application of Cross-Disciplinary Semantic Mapping in the fields of Renewable Energy and Agriculture. It delves into how key terms and concepts are uniquely defined and utilized within these two distinct sectors, and how their semantic overlaps and divergences play a crucial role in interdisciplinary communication and collaboration. Through a detailed analysis of 20 specific terms—10 from each discipline and 5 shared across both—the study highlights the importance of linguistic nuances in fostering mutual understanding and aligning project objectives. The article presents case studies demonstrating the practical application of this approach in real-world scenarios, illustrating how redefining and aligning key terms can lead to successful collaborative outcomes.
Библиографические ссылки
Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125.
Akbaba, R. S., & Tunagür, M. (2018). A content analysis on the use of information technologies in thelanguage skills. Journal of Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Social Sciences Institute, 4(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.427196
Alhujaylan, H. (2019). An assessment of the effectiveness of CALL in teaching English language writing skills in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal (5), 18-27.
Arslan, A. (2020). A systematic review on flipped learning in teaching English as a foreign or second language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 775-797.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3412
Fabregas, R., Kremer, M. & Schilbach, F. 2019. Realizing the potential of digital development: the case of agricultural advice. Science, 366(6471): eaay3038.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3038
Garrett, N. (2009). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 697-718.
Garrison, D. & Cleveland-Innes, Martha. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. The American Journal of Distance Education. 19. 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
He, P., & Veronesi, M. (2017). Personality traits and renewable energy technology adoption: A policy case study from China. Energy policy, 107, 472-479.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.017
Mustaeva, G. S., Qurbanova, M. M., & Ganihanova, M. B. (2023). Use of English terminology in technical and transport universities. In E3S Web of Conferences: Vol.413. XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2023” (Art. No. 03013).https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341303013
Mustaeva, G. S., Saidivalieva, B. S., & Ataeva, G. B. (2022). Features of professional vocabulary and its difference from terms. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2432,No. 060017). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089598
Mustaeva, G., & Ataeva, G. (2023). The role of business English in modern logistics. In E3S Web of Conferences: Vol. 402. International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum -TransSiberia 2023 (Art. No. 08008). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340208008
Okojie, M. C. P. O., Olinzock, A. A., & Okojie-Boulder, T. C. (2006). The pedagogy of technology integration. The Journal of Technology Studies, 32(2), 66-71.https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v32i2.a.1
Paul, C., Techen, A.-K., Robinson, J.S. & Helming, K. 2019. Rebound effects in agricultural land and soil management: Review and analytical framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227: 1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.115
Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025
Rasulov, M., Masharipov, M., & Ismatullaev, A. (2021). Optimization of the terminal operating mode during the formation of a container block train. In E3S Web of Conferences: Vol. 264. International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2021) (Art. No. 05025). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126405025
Wolsink, Maarten. 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary" Energies 13, no. 11: 2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112871
Zhu, B., Zhang, W., Du, J., Zhou, W., Qiu, T., & Li, Q. (2011). Adoption of renewable energy technologies (RETs): A survey on rural construction in China. Technology in Society, 33(3-4), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.09.002
Pelletier, N., Audsley, E., Brodt, S., Garnett, T., Henriksson, P., Kendall, A., Kramer, K. J., Murphy, D., Nemecek, T., & Troell, M. (2011). Energy intensity of agriculture and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 223-246.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-081710-161014
